Saturday, July 13, 2024

I met Frederick Copleston.

[Fathter Greg Sharkey visited me here in Bangkok last Monday. He lived with Copleston in the Jesuit house on Farm Street while earning his Sanskrit degree. I talked about this meeting. Greg also confirmed that the robe Father Copleston wore was the English Jesuit habit. I went to look for this short piece I wrote and tried looking for it on my blog. I am republishing it here].

In 1965, I met with the famous English Jesuit Frederick Copleston and could not come up with one decent philosophical question. 

I have been trying to collect the memories of our visit. It was 60 years ago, and not a huge breakthrough event in my spiritual journey, so parts of it are hazy and will remain so, but given that I was the only undergraduate on the schedule of a renowned Jesuit philosopher, it was an honor and, as you will see, memorable. Father Bill Nolan, the Dartmouth Newman Chaplin, of course, knew that I wanted to become a Jesuit and did everything he could to encourage me, which was the explicit reason for the interview.


The process of memory is notoriously unreliable. Recall activates a selective circuit in the brain, and we tend to recall those juicy bits that confirm the stories we tell ourselves. Even if the date, time, and location are reasonably accurate, even if they can be verified, the data collection system is not as if it were a selfie with the Pope. It still might be difficult to remember whether it was a bright day or if the autumn winds were blowing. On top of that, the things we retrieve may hold some key that we are not fully aware of. There could be some mystery-solving, like the crumbs you laid on the path to Grandma’s house. 


Copleston came to Dartmouth and stayed at the Newman Center for perhaps a week. I checked the online archives to identify events or colloquia in the Philosophy Department. None. Perhaps he had been scheduled at BC, Harvard or Fordham, and Nolan arranged to have him lecture at the Aquinas Center, which he often did. That is possible, even likely. It is also likely that if Copleston had been in Hanover at the invitation of the College, he would have stayed at Aquinas House. He was a very traditional old-school Jesuit who rose at 5 AM every day, did his meditation, and then said Mass. Mass would not have been complicated if the College put him up in a hotel room.


Bill Nolan gave him the office of his assistant for the week, and Copleston had office hours. I’m sure many Dartmouth faculty were anxious to meet him. I remember that my hour was carefully scheduled. I even remember what he wore. Over a simply tailored black suit and a tall white collar that I associated with Anglican clerics, he wore what I thought was a strange robe, even for a scholar priest. It was not the long black Jesuit habit I knew from the Jesuits at Fairfield. It might have been a don’s gown from Heythrop. There was no sash, and the sleeves seemed to be broad black ribbons that dropped from the elbow. I recall that his speech was very precise and soft-spoken. I would characterize it as meticulous. He didn’t rush, and my memory, even after 60 years, was that he was a careful listener. Google tells me he would have been just a few years older than my father, but I didn’t get any daddy vibe. 


He had just published Volume 7 of his monumental 11-volume History of Philosophy: Fichte to Nietzsche. His debates about the existence of God with Bertrand Russell, which made him very famous in Catholic circles, had taken place at least 15 years earlier, but I had no questions to ask about his writing or the debate. Perhaps Bill Nolan had told him that I wanted to enter the Jesuits, or I did. I told him about my parents' vehement opposition.


I was now 21 and could enter without their permission, and I was tempted to do that, but I promised them that I would finish college before I set off on what they considered a disastrous career choice. He asked me what I was studying and whether I liked it and pointed out how it would do no harm when I became a Jesuit. When he asked why I wanted to be a Jesuit. I mumbled something about being impressed by certain scholastics and priests in prep school. Then he got personal and told me that his own parents had opposed his becoming a Catholic priest, but he persisted and continued to treat them with love and respect. He said that they eventually came to support his decision. After some quiet time, he looked at his watch and said that he would have to begin preparing for another meeting and would pray for me. 


I had an interview with the man whom I imagined might have removed any doubt about Aquinas’s Unmoved Mover argument for the existence of God, and instead received the promise of prayer to resolve a painful family situation. 


Saturday, June 29, 2024

Fly Away

Koan 53, Blue Cliff Record

Pai Chang’s Wild Ducks


Why did it take a twinge of pain to wake me up?

The pain was real

Or at least I feel it

Asleep so comfortably, 

Mixed with dreams of geese (I transposed)

Flying away

Or landing

Or swimming in the reflecting pool in front of the Jefferson Memorial (I am dreaming)

They flew off course

Attracting crowds and iPhones clicking

As if to confirm Thomas’s 

Republican dreams.

.

Or did the somnambulist bump into a door

realizing the traffic just beyond

Might be real danger

Even being totally alert does not guarantee that I will survive


I feel as if sometimes I dance with your answers,’Ma,

Was it a real question

Or just words, They are just words,

Sounds connected with a dream or twinge of pain


Master Ma talks as if there were a sequence of events

Let me correct him.

That has meaning.--flying, landing, then flying away

There is no causal sequence of events in dreams

They have no existence


Dream on.’

Listen to Keith Jarrett

He gets the dreaming sequence right

Mysteriously connected

Without pain.


Friday, June 28, 2024

Schism Schmisum--

On hearing that the Doctrine of the Faith summons former U.S. nuncio, Archbishop Carlo Maria ViganĂ², to testify on charges of schism. Vigano calls it an honor. I don’t know why you need to be so right, or maybe I just don’t understand it, but honey, you are just being a doctrinaire asshole.

Let’s talk schismatics or at least have a laugh or two.


Schism is defined as the formal separation of a Church into two Churches or the secession of some group (or an individual?) owing to doctrinal and other differences. Is this a threat?


I remember a conversation with Avery Dulles. As might be expected as the son of his father and a respected Catholic theologian, he served on several high-level ecumenical commissions. He told me (with his slight laugh and smile that disguised a complaint) that he often worked long hours on a paper describing doctrinal agreements and continuing points of dispute with a few modest suggestions to explore if the divide was real, imagined, or even important. And you can be sure his work was meticulous and exacting. The commission’s meeting began with a prayer petitioning the God of the doctrinal points they could agree upon and avoiding the rest. After Avery presented his paper, he was thanked and applauded. Then, the other side’s theologians presented a paper outlining their position and objections. They sat down and were politely applauded. Then they worked together on the closing statement: we can agree on X for Y reason, and we continue to disagree on Zed for Z. We were happy to have this exchange and pray for our continued growth in the Spirit, although let’s not go overboard in our expectations. Nothing changed and probably won’t--not after they appointed a woman as the presiding bishop, but let’s pass over that in silence and leak it to Kaiser or the NCR.


But all in all, this was far better than what might have happened just a few centuries earlier--one of those parties would have been burned at the stake. Depending on your side, the painful deaths of the heretics or martyrs became myths to warn succeeding generations, train them in self-sacrificial virtue, and remind them that some things can never be compromised. The Inquisitors made decisions about who needed to be celebrated, who needed to be blamed, and what lessons the survivors needed to draw. 


A bloody time. Thousands were executed. The Roman Catholics did it, as did the newly reformed English Church. The Spanish Inquisition is now the stuff of jokes, but it was a life and death matter for the Jews, the conversos, and the dissenters who were murdered. A lot has changed over a few centuries, but we can’t erase that part of history that affronts our sensibilities. Revisionists erase the parts of history that don’t conform to the current myth. But keep the threat of schism alive.


An earlier Jesuit cardinal was not so lucky. In 1599, immediately after he was appointed Cardinal, Pope Clement made Robert Bellarmine an Inquisitor, and he served as one of the judges at Giordano Bruno's trial and concurred in the decision to condemn Bruno to be burned at the stake. It was a hard, thankless task for the quiet, saintly scholar, but he had a job description. And there were schisms to the right, to the left, and particularly to the north. I mentioned that to Avery once, and he said thank God we’re past that (although he continued to make a case for capital punishment). And he made the very good point that at least we are talking to one another. 


Talking is a good thing. It's the only thing other than charitable actions and loving your mother. I say I would talk to anyone, but I really don’t think I want to be in the same room as Bishop Barron, Archbishop Carlo Maria ViganĂ³, or Archbishop Sal Cordileone. Not that I couldn’t make small talk, but why bother? They would not be much interested in talking to me unless they might try to convert me, I suppose, and I think that the Compas are aware of just how open I would be to that conversation. Besides, my dance card is pretty full. 


I loved talking with Avery. Even though we were worlds apart on most issues, he and I always tried to find where we might have an interesting conversation. That changed slightly after he was made a Cardinal, but not much. 


The context was love, respect, and taking action to keep that flame burning. I told him that I went to confession with a high-church episcopal priest when I was doing my AA 4th Step because it felt right. He was a friend, and I was out of touch with any Jesuits I might have asked. He told me that although he disapproved, it was a valid sacrament. Then I had to tell him that this priest friend worked for the Jesuits at Saint Agnes in the Haight. Once, he was at a party for Bishop Ignatius Wang. The bishop got hammered and went on and on about same-sex marriage. My friend was wearing a clerical collar, and Bishop Wang probably presumed that my friend was Roman. His husband, sitting next to him, was wearing a sweater on the cold San Francisco evening. My friend didn’t introduce his husband for obvious reasons, such as job security. 


I almost got Avery to laugh. 








Saturday, June 15, 2024

Berryman

Dead poet on dead poet: a poem by W. S. Merwin (1927-2019) about John Berryman (1914-1972); from *Opening the Hand*,


Berryman


I will tell you what he told me

in the years just after the war

as we then called

the second world war


don't lose your arrogance yet he said

you can do that when you're older

lose it too soon and you may

merely replace it with vanity


just one time he suggested

changing the usual order

of the same words in a line of verse

why point out a thing twice


he suggested I pray to the Muse

get down on my knees and pray

right there in the corner and he

said he meant it literally


it was in the days before the beard

and the drink but he was deep

in tides of his own through which he sailed

chin sideways and head tilted like a tacking sloop


he was far older than the dates allowed for

much older than I was he was in his thirties

he snapped down his nose with an accent

I think he had affected in England


as for publishing he advised me

to paper my wall with rejection slips

his lips and the bones of his long fingers trembled

with the vehemence of his views about poetry


he said the great presence

that permitted everything and transmuted it

in poetry was passion

passion was genius and he praised movement and invention


I had hardly begun to read

I asked how can you ever be sure

that what you write is really

any good at all and he said you can't


you can't you can never be sure

you die without knowing

whether anything you wrote was any good

if you have to be sure don't write